You can always change this.

On February 22nd, a local newspaper called Karjalainen published a special ‘theme’, called ‘Seniori-teema’, an inlaid sheet focused on senior citizens. One could find there articles covering about all-a-senior-needs-to-know, and a lot of advertiments.

Our internal press office have submitted several ideas to be included into the magazine, however, not all of them were accepted for publication. Our reporters found the leftovers in a Recycle Bin, and we now bring those to our readers!

Original photo by (C) http://flickr.com/photos/grogg/

Karjalainen: Mitali tuli, mutta väri oli väärä that could be translated to something like “We got a medal, but the (color) denomination was wrong!“
In a Czech online news, I found this pearl: Hokejisté začínají pouť za olympijským zlatem. That means: “(Czech) Hockey-players start the journey to olympic gold“

Shall we call these 1) total looses of sense and reality, 2) maximal optimism, 3) arrogance, 4) or something else?

Yes, it’s been already for some time I felt that the air at the corridors of edtech starts to stink. Days go peacefully by, only peronen is working :) Common people, don’t you miss some fun? If only on Friday?! It feels we do this science so seriously. It actually makes me like I shall make balls out of somebody, it forces me!

I cannot bear that pressure anymore, so expect somethingawful, soon :).

Most of the great and fundamental scientific ideas and findings, such the theory of evolution, relativity, or genetics have greatly influenced and imho also enriched philosophy. Or changed our views on this world. Similarly ‘implicating’ ideas in computer science can perhaps be found too, e.g. the Church-Turing theorem or the Turing test. However, comparing to the recent findings from genetics research or space-research, these are relatively ancient. Or have I forgotten something? Or is it really so that computer science research has little to communicate to philosophy?