February 09, 2010
Nearly 100 top students and professionals from over 30 countries have joined together to innovate new ways for us to better utilize (or even create) emerging technologies that can bridge some of the cultural/philosophical differences in the world.
The course, called either ICT4CC (University of Stockholm) or ICT4ID (University of Eastern Finland), is going to be [...]
January 31, 2010
score: 9 vs 1 on what am I doing? » edtech
Publications on January 2010: I got 2 new rejections and 1 acceptance.
When I got the acceptance, I wanted to believe it will be a change of trend and I will get more papers accepted. However, didn’t want to celebrate too fast, as I knew two more feedbacks should be coming this month. Today those feedbacks [...]
ut&c #1: How to catch an iPhone thief on what am I doing? » edtech
It is my impression that USA promotes detective movies, novels and TV shows. At least it has a wide sample of that genre. Then when I read the article of “how to catch an iPhone thief” I could say the fact that happens in the USA and in CA, makes it just the perfect location.
Actually, [...]
January 19, 2010
all of us are guilty at some level on what am I doing? » edtech
In October I wrote about some of my reflections about natural disasters and our behaviors. This topic affects me deeply.
Today is Haiti.
Since I first read the notice of the earthquake, I had been following closely. Maybe this time I identify a bit more as I lived the earthquake of Mexico ’85 on a fifth floor [...]
January 09, 2010
research basics: ethics and philosophy. on what am I doing? » edtech
If one wants to be a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) two things must be present in the basic foundations of this path, according to my actual perspective. Both of this elements I am learning them in a very hard way, as I was clueless about them and no-one guide me about them. Those two essentials [...]
January 03, 2010
each day can be a celebration day – it is up to us on what am I doing? » edtech
Hmmm…. for me “New Years” is like the earth’s birthday. Humans made it up, as we have no idea when our planet born but anyway humans celebrate together this day. Most of the people in this season are happy and with good energy, however it is possible to find depression too, which is understandable. However, [...]
December 31, 2009
December 25, 2009
graduation on what am I doing? » edtech
The graduation was a big event. Schoolteachers, Tumaini University students and some teachers, family and community member were present. The children move the desks from the schools to allow adults to sit, and they were at one side of the area sitting on the floor, however all assistants were under the shade of the same [...]
intensive workshop: “working for my Dreams” (2/2) – workshop on what am I doing? » edtech
The workshop has been VERY intensive. My nights-sleep average during the workshop period was four hrs a day approximately. I was the last one to go to bed and usually I got up before the sunrise. This gave me the opportunity to realize the night rhythm in Iringa: first relative quietness (I say relative because [...]
December 13, 2009
November 30, 2009
November 25, 2009
intensive workshop: ” Working for my Dreams” (1/2) – background & trip on what am I doing? » edtech
The reason for me to be in a, Tanzania, Africa is to run this workshop. Within my research this is the way to validate my model, but this will be material for other post. Right now let’s focus on “Working for your Dreams”.
Until now I am able to write about this. Before my trip, in [...]
November 17, 2009
NSS Spot Meeting at Ruaha National Park on Around the World
This part of North-South-South exchange progam network meeting at Tumaini University and Ruaha National Park, Tanzania, was highly successful as the pictures below show. More results to follow…
November 07, 2009
November 04, 2009
OLPC and other interesting things on Around the World
Tanzania has exposed me to very many new and interesting things, such as kiti moto and dala dala, and not to forget one of the most delicious part of Tanzania, Ndovu. Thanks for Marcus for introducing these things for me at Dar es Salaam and Iringa!
One of the most interesting thing has been Tumaini University’s [...]
More Nuclear Power? yes, Yes, and YES, please! on Autopsy of Me, Myself, and I
I think that I am in a dire need for a color analyst's help, you know the ones, who help you to find the power of colors in your life. The reason for this is that lately it has been so sadly that every time, when I happen to hear comments coming from a Finnish political party that uses green color in their symbols, I get an acute case of nausea.
Latest case that proved this to be true has been the discussion related to the number of new nuclear plants needed in Finland in future. A voice from yesterday's world said in media that he is willing to consider one additional plant, where as voice from some kind of cuckoo wonderland having nothing to do with reality said that she thinks no additional plants are needed in Finland.
Personally I find it very odd in first place, if politicians would now cast in stone some figure, such as 1, which would then limit the number of new nuclear plants allowed to be built in Finland in near future. The reason, why I find it odd, is that in my opinion, if all the applicants fulfill all the necessary demands set by legislation and have the necessary funding and plan for future waste management in place, then all of them should be granted the permission to build the plant. In free market economy, which I hope also Finland is, it should not be the politicians, who check their crystal balls and say how many new plants are needed - that is how things were ran in late Soviet Union, and mostly they were ran very badly.
Secondly, the energy coming from potential new plants would not be only added up to the present energy pool, but it would actually have to cover several sources that are now present, but will not be there in future. These include e.g. electricity imports from Russia and its not-so-up-to modern standards energy plants, old Finnish power plants still using fossil fuels, and the two oldest Finnish nuclear power plants that are during the coming decades slowly coming to the end of their life-cycle. Additionally, it is just fair to assume, that our life style in future will not turn into less electricity intensive, but it is more likely that the development will be contrary to that. One example is the common belief that more traffic in future will become ran on electricity instead of relaying on fossil fuels. All these things combined mean that there is demand for more energy in future, and this is also development on which the permission applying energy companies are putting their bet on, when calculating returns on their huge investments.
Thirdly, building nuclear plants will provide a great opportunity for Finnish companies involved in these projects to develop their capabilities and know-how in an area, which will be in great demand in future. There is great need for major scale electricity production in developing countries such as India. This need cannot be covered with solar or wind power, but nuclear plants, plenty of them, are needed. These kinds of projects taking place abroad offer opportunities also for Finnish companies to sell their accumulated knowledge. And in addition to exporting know-how, if there is energy surplus after all the national demand, there would be interesting opportunities in Baltic countries, where we could sell reliably produced energy, when they have closed the Soviet-era remnant, Ingalina Nuclear Power plant. Furthermore, unifying electricity markets in Europe offer additional interesting opportunities for Finnish electricity companies to sell their production, whether it has been produced from renewable sources or by splitting of nuclei.
Lastly, it is important to acknowledge that even if we solve our macro level electricity production needs with nuclear energy, there are still lot of local or micro level energy and electricity production demands that need to be covered through other means than by nuclear plants. Such local production is important e.g. from national security perspective, where nation's complete reliance on small number of large energy production plants would be a major risk taking. New local level power plant investments should mostly include either plants burning household waste or renewable energy plants based on for example wood pellets, solar panels, or wind mills. Such local demand, which would be in addition to the present and future global market demand, definitely would support Finnish companies working on those business areas and developing new technologies. Furthermore, as there seems to exist some demand from households and SMEs for energy produced from renewable energy sources, there will certainly be electricity companies that will supply that demand.
Latest case that proved this to be true has been the discussion related to the number of new nuclear plants needed in Finland in future. A voice from yesterday's world said in media that he is willing to consider one additional plant, where as voice from some kind of cuckoo wonderland having nothing to do with reality said that she thinks no additional plants are needed in Finland.
Personally I find it very odd in first place, if politicians would now cast in stone some figure, such as 1, which would then limit the number of new nuclear plants allowed to be built in Finland in near future. The reason, why I find it odd, is that in my opinion, if all the applicants fulfill all the necessary demands set by legislation and have the necessary funding and plan for future waste management in place, then all of them should be granted the permission to build the plant. In free market economy, which I hope also Finland is, it should not be the politicians, who check their crystal balls and say how many new plants are needed - that is how things were ran in late Soviet Union, and mostly they were ran very badly.
Secondly, the energy coming from potential new plants would not be only added up to the present energy pool, but it would actually have to cover several sources that are now present, but will not be there in future. These include e.g. electricity imports from Russia and its not-so-up-to modern standards energy plants, old Finnish power plants still using fossil fuels, and the two oldest Finnish nuclear power plants that are during the coming decades slowly coming to the end of their life-cycle. Additionally, it is just fair to assume, that our life style in future will not turn into less electricity intensive, but it is more likely that the development will be contrary to that. One example is the common belief that more traffic in future will become ran on electricity instead of relaying on fossil fuels. All these things combined mean that there is demand for more energy in future, and this is also development on which the permission applying energy companies are putting their bet on, when calculating returns on their huge investments.
Thirdly, building nuclear plants will provide a great opportunity for Finnish companies involved in these projects to develop their capabilities and know-how in an area, which will be in great demand in future. There is great need for major scale electricity production in developing countries such as India. This need cannot be covered with solar or wind power, but nuclear plants, plenty of them, are needed. These kinds of projects taking place abroad offer opportunities also for Finnish companies to sell their accumulated knowledge. And in addition to exporting know-how, if there is energy surplus after all the national demand, there would be interesting opportunities in Baltic countries, where we could sell reliably produced energy, when they have closed the Soviet-era remnant, Ingalina Nuclear Power plant. Furthermore, unifying electricity markets in Europe offer additional interesting opportunities for Finnish electricity companies to sell their production, whether it has been produced from renewable sources or by splitting of nuclei.
Lastly, it is important to acknowledge that even if we solve our macro level electricity production needs with nuclear energy, there are still lot of local or micro level energy and electricity production demands that need to be covered through other means than by nuclear plants. Such local production is important e.g. from national security perspective, where nation's complete reliance on small number of large energy production plants would be a major risk taking. New local level power plant investments should mostly include either plants burning household waste or renewable energy plants based on for example wood pellets, solar panels, or wind mills. Such local demand, which would be in addition to the present and future global market demand, definitely would support Finnish companies working on those business areas and developing new technologies. Furthermore, as there seems to exist some demand from households and SMEs for energy produced from renewable energy sources, there will certainly be electricity companies that will supply that demand.
by Pasi Eronen (noreply@blogger.com) at November 04, 2009 01:46 PM
October 25, 2009
take advantage of critcism… on what am I doing? » edtech
Some weeks ago I read “How to Get Ideas” from Hack Foster. A very good book from different perspectives, giving me food for the thought and some reminders.
Today I feel the book is full of truth! This year I had been working in focusing my research. Besides my “Licentiate” I wrote 8 LONG papers [...]
October 17, 2009
The Lisbon Treaty and the Czechs on You can always change this.
You must have heard about the ratification process of LT. At the time of the writing, most countries 26 out of 28, the Irish included (they had a second go and said OK), had approved=ratified the treaty. Italy is just depositing the documents, so we have one and only remaining country. (Now, there is some [...]
October 15, 2009
it is a right to have broadband in Finland on what am I doing? » edtech
Here is the news article. It makes me feel proud of this country.
This action shows, at least to me, how important is for Finns to have access to information. But it is clear, the population is educated enough to have their own critical thinking on the information they read. As more thinking minds you have, [...]
